The concept of squatters’ rights, which is more formally known as adverse possession, is a principle in property law that allows a person who possesses the land of another for an extended period to claim legal title to that land.
This concept is often seen as controversial because it seems to go against the basic principle of property ownership—that the person who holds legal title to the land should be its owner.
However, squatters’ rights are recognized in some form in many jurisdictions around the world.
To understand why squatters may have rights, it’s important to consider the historical, legal, and social contexts of adverse possession.
Historical Context
The roots of adverse possession lie far back in history. In agrarian societies, land was the most significant resource, and the use of land was often seen as more important than formal ownership.
If land was not being used, it made sense for someone who would use it to take it over. This practical approach helped ensure that land was not wasted.
Legal Justifications
1. Promotion of Land Use
One of the main reasons adverse possession exists is to promote the efficient use of land.
If someone is making productive use of a piece of property that the legal owner has abandoned or ignored, the law may reward the squatter by granting them title to the land.
2. Protection of Expectations
If someone has been living on and caring for a piece of land for many years, it would often be unfair to eject them simply because someone else holds the legal title.
Adverse possession protects individuals who have established their lives on a particular piece of land.
3. Settlement of Land Disputes
Adverse possession can clear up doubts over land titles by providing a clear cut-off after which no action can be taken to reclaim the land.
This helps resolve potential disputes and brings certainty to property records.
4. Statute of Limitations
Like other areas of law, property law has a statute of limitations. This legal principle aims to prevent legal claims from hanging indefinitely over property.
Those rights may be lost if the original owner does not exert their legal rights within a certain time frame (which varies by jurisdiction).
5. Correcting Survey Errors
Sometimes, especially in older communities, the actual boundaries that people observe may not match the legal boundaries because of survey errors.
Over time, the practical boundaries take precedence, and adverse possession can regularize the situation legally.
Social and Policy Considerations
6. Affordable Housing and Homelessness
In areas where housing is scarce and homelessness is a problem, some argue that allowing squatters to claim unused buildings or land can be part of a solution.
It can be a way of redistributing unused assets to those who need them most.
7. Prevention of Blight
Properties that are left empty and unmaintained can become eyesores or havens for crime. Squatters may actually help maintain and improve these spaces, which benefits the wider community.
8. Equity Concerns
Some perceive adverse possession as a form of justice or natural equity.
If an owner neglects or shows no interest in the land while another person maintains it and pays taxes over many years, some feel that the squatter has earned the right to the land.
Read Also:
- Removing Squatters by Force
- The Legality of Car Repossession Without Notice
- What is a Parcel Real Estate
Conditions for Adverse Possession
It’s also worth noting that claiming land through adverse possession is not easy. The squatter must meet several rigorous conditions:
Hostile Possession: The squatter must possess the land without the owner’s permission.
Actual Possession: The squatter must be physically present on the land and treat it as their own.
Open and Notorious: The possession must be obvious to anyone, including the owner. Squatting secretly won’t count.
Exclusive and Continuous Possession: The squatter must not share possession with strangers and must hold the land continuously for a specified period, usually many years.
Paying Property Taxes: In some areas, the squatter must have paid property taxes on the land.
Contemporary Views and Reforms
Attitudes toward squatters’ rights vary, and the details of the law differ significantly by jurisdiction. In recent years, some places have strengthened the rights of property owners and made it harder to claim land through adverse possession.
Others have sought to balance property rights with housing and social justice concerns.